Re: 9.5 release notes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.5 release notes
Date: 2015-06-26 16:36:31
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob4=3wKbw2Qvx6YvT87w6XCSoGEWqDSkTcAz+OVXZ6-BQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2015-06-11 PM 01:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
>> the output here:
>>
>> http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
>>
>> and it will eventually appear here:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release.html
>>
>> I am ready to make suggested adjustments, though I am traveling for
>> conferences for the next ten days so there might a delay in my replies.
>>
>
> Is it intentional that the following items are separate?
>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> Move <application>pg_upgrade</> from <filename>contrib</> to
> <filename>src/bin</> (Peter Eisentraut)
> </para>
> </listitem>
>
>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> Move <application>pg_upgrade_support</> code into backend and
> remove the module (Peter Eisentraut)
> </para>
> </listitem>
>
> Or could they made into one item?

I think one item would be fine.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-06-26 16:42:22 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-06-26 16:30:00 Re: GIN: Implementing triConsistent and strategy number