From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: improve pgbench syntax error messages |
Date: | 2015-03-04 14:58:06 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob3D2qTjFuWWK5f3ECoVW6hsqz4OwCnqXwmhdczTJNPLA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> Report the origin of syntax errors from pgbench.
>
> Currently only the column number (for expressions) and command are
> essentially reported:
>
> sh> ./pgbench -f bad.sql
> syntax error at column 14
> set: parse error
>
> The patch helps locate the origin of errors with the file name, line number
> and the actual text triggering the issue (either the line or an extract for
> expressions):
>
> sh> ./pgbench -f bad.sql
> syntax error at column 14
> error while processing "bad.sql" line 3: (1021 * :id) %
> set: parse error
>
> Whether using a macro is the right tool is debatable. The contents could be
> expanded, but that would mean replicating the same message over and over
> again, so it seems cleaner to me this way. An function seems overkill.
As I mentioned on the other thread, I'd really like to get this into a
better format, where each error message is on one line. Looking at
that, you can't tell whether you've got one mistake, two mistakes, or
three mistakes.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-04 14:59:09 | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-04 14:55:01 | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita |