Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_proc comment grammar

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_proc comment grammar
Date: 2017-02-15 17:16:36
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob3ARtNsmRweSn0UsZe7_oj4BQXkrmcHUCRj7AgrkEYCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:40 AM, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> wrote:
> Fixes some DESCR() grammar mistakes introduced by the xlog -> wal changes.

Thanks, David!

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-02-15 17:16:46 Re: Does having a NULL column automatically exclude the table from the tupleDesc cache?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-02-15 17:14:42 Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?