| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: varlena beyond 1GB and matrix |
| Date: | 2016-12-23 17:31:50 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob2H4oBOje1Bqgo1D8QAMuYV_wMXSC6nWUGzRs+J+FmiQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> 2016-12-23 8:23 GMT+09:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>>>> Handling objects >1GB at all seems like the harder part of the
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>> I could get your point almost. Does the last line above mention about
>>> amount of the data object >1GB? even if the "super-varlena" format
>>> allows 64bit length?
>>
>> Sorry, I can't understand your question about what I wrote.
>>
> I thought you just pointed out it is always harder part to treat large
> amount of data even if data format allows >1GB or more. Right?
I *think* we agreeing. But I'm still not 100% sure.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2016-12-23 17:46:15 | Re: proposal: session server side variables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-23 17:30:27 | Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance |