| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jerry Jelinek <jerry(dot)jelinek(at)joyent(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling |
| Date: | 2018-07-18 01:01:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob0hs=eZ7RquTLzYUwAuHtgORvPxjNXgifZ04he-JK7Rw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The actual implementation could use another round of consideration. I
> wonder how this should interact with min_wal_size. Wouldn't
> min_wal_size = 0 already do what we need (if you could set it to 0,
> which is currently not possible)?
Hmm, would that actually disable recycling, or just make it happen only rarely?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-07-18 01:11:19 | Re: ENOSPC FailedAssertion("!(RefCountErrors == 0)" |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-07-18 00:59:14 | Re: ENOSPC FailedAssertion("!(RefCountErrors == 0)" |