Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yoshimi Ichiyanagi <ichiyanagi(dot)yoshimi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "menjo(dot)takashi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <menjo(dot)takashi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "ishizaki(dot)teruaki(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <ishizaki(dot)teruaki(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory
Date: 2018-01-30 14:35:50
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob0TF8q+PDYmVL_D00-DeuJ9aB9WaKLQhLwoKx+yQ63Cg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:37 AM, Yoshimi Ichiyanagi
<ichiyanagi(dot)yoshimi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server suported PMEM [1][2].
> I think it is not too early for PostgreSQL to support PMEM.

I agree; it's good to have the option available for those who have
access to the hardware.

If you haven't added your patch to the next CommitFest, please do so.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-01-30 15:47:39 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-01-30 14:24:57 Re: csv format for psql