Re: Alter index rename concurrently to

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov(at)mail(dot)ru>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alter index rename concurrently to
Date: 2018-08-03 13:00:26
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob0KOpgME1RBeLhSS-ZcDbB7cPxWPgV_44RrwxgRLTZxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> ISTM, if you want to increase consistency in this area, you've to go
> further. E.g. processing invalidations in StartTransactionCommand() in
> all states, which'd give you a lot more consistency.

Hmm, that seems like a pretty good idea.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2018-08-03 13:04:32 Re: doc - add missing documentation for "acldefault"
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-08-03 12:59:43 Re: partition tree inspection functions