Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date: 2016-03-04 16:02:15
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob=a+uaz3Li=J8nwLsZ7OYRs76h0nxUMaGhffwJmy7B8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Sure. If you have an idea what the right thing to do is, please go
>> ahead.
>
> Yeah, I'll modify the patch and commit sometime later today.

OK, if you're basing that on the patch I sent upthread, please credit
Rahila Syed as the original author of that code. (I modified it
before posting, but only trivially.) Of course if you do something
else, then never mind.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-04 16:03:08 Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-03-04 16:01:26 Re: syslog configurable line splitting behavior