Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
Date: 2019-04-08 14:40:41
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob=HVg+tvF5XyWW060K3XJsc-y1JdTOAVXk6zLGkHGQiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Should I add this patch to Older Bugs [1]?
>
> Yeah, it's an open issue IMO. I think we've been focusing on getting
> as many feature patches done as we could during the CF, but now it's
> time to start mopping up problems like this one.

Do you have any further thoughts based on my last response?

Does anyone else wish to offer opinions?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-04-08 14:41:49 Re: Translation updates for zh_CN.po (Chinese Simplified)
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2019-04-08 14:32:59 Re: change password_encryption default to scram-sha-256?