Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Date: 2018-04-25 18:30:50
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob=2g_u7uinMHdVxD=GPZBRe7ouG5G=zD096tU5n_qGOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Never mind. There was a lot of items especially at the last CommitFest.
>
>> In terms of moving forward, I'd still like to hear what
>> Andres has to say about the comments I made on March 1st.
>
> Yeah, agreed.

$ ping -n andres.freund
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
Request timeout for icmp_seq 4
^C
--- andres.freund ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss

Meanwhile, https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4c171ffe-e3ee-acc5-9066-a40d52bc5ae9@postgrespro.ru
shows that this patch has some benefits for other cases, which is a
point in favor IMHO.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-04-25 18:41:44 Re: [HACKERS] lseek/read/write overhead becomes visible at scale ..
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-04-25 18:27:58 Re: Postgres stucks in deadlock detection