Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, v(dot)makarov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size
Date: 2020-01-07 17:21:26
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob=-phbXtOjSsOgh9_3m4KJ5F2Kq73fM-qaYACA2jUQ=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 11:01 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Sounds like an agreement then. The original patch documents the range
> in postgresql.conf.sample, which is fine by me as this is done for
> some parameters, and skips the part about doc/, which also matches
> with the surrounding effort for other parameters, so the whole looks
> fine seen from here. Anybody willing to commit that?

Done. I didn't commit the postgresql.conf.sample change because:

(1) I think Bruce voted against it.

(2) It makes the line a little wide, and I'd rather not do that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-07 17:47:00 Re: ERROR: attribute number 6 exceeds number of columns 5
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-01-07 17:08:45 Re: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions