| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Per-Database Roles |
| Date: | 2012-05-28 19:56:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob+Ywkb85zKT=Cc2EkN_O9+LPjPOOOgcCekRZMar9ymEw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On tis, 2012-05-22 at 10:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think we should have made roles and tablespaces database
>> objects rather than shared objects,
>
> User names are global objects in the SQL standard, which is part of the
> reason that the current setup was never seriously challenged.
Does the SQL standard really discriminate between the database and the
cluster? Wow.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-28 19:59:28 | Re: Per-Database Roles |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-28 19:55:16 | Re: How could we make it simple to access the log as a table? |