Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date: 2017-08-17 18:14:16
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob+S=c=wqaJXNgKT2VhhAVRYFz=MagoTDWb0MueM1xBxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Pushed, with minor tidying of the test case. I think we can now
>> close this open item.
>
> Nope, spoke too soon. See buildfarm.
>
> (Man, am I glad I insisted on a test case.)

Whoa, that's not good.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-17 18:52:22 Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-08-17 18:06:59 Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-08-17 18:32:50 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-08-17 18:06:59 Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90