Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date: 2017-03-22 03:49:57
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoazs0db27H6h4CoKysmZuS=ccjdcmhB21dZjEOPUTsEEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm a little worried that this whole question of changing the file
> naming scheme is a diversion which will result in torpedoing any
> chance of getting some kind of improvement here for v11. I don't
> think the patch is all that far from being committable but it's not
> going to get there if we start redesigning the world around it.

Ha. A little Freudian slip there, since I obviously meant v10.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-22 03:50:38 Re: [PATCH v1] Add and report the new "in_hot_standby" GUC pseudo-variable.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-22 03:49:30 Re: increasing the default WAL segment size