Re: Odd oid-system-column handling in postgres_fdw

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Odd oid-system-column handling in postgres_fdw
Date: 2016-05-16 15:26:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoazjErU49GtxjR9Sj7kSm+tTsUAFgOqg2Et1fAZCmKdpQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I'll add this to the next CF.

Makes sense. I think this is basically a new feature, so let's treat
it that way.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-05-16 15:28:37 Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast() busted? (was atomic pin/unpin causing errors)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-05-16 15:25:11 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW