Re: Couple of issues with prepared FETCH commands

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Couple of issues with prepared FETCH commands
Date: 2017-01-11 20:08:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaycdO+5StVFz4E+BiT1pzML3r=_V=VMBQvfQkTQzwjrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> But the problem that actually came up is this: if you do the PQprepare
> before the named cursor has actually been opened, then everything works
> _up until_ the first event, such as a change to search_path, that forces
> a revalidation; and at that point it fails with the "must not change
> result type" error _even if_ the cursor always has exactly the same
> result type. This happens because the initial prepare actually stored
> NULL for plansource->resultDesc, since the cursor name wasn't found,
> while on the revalidate, when the cursor obviously does exist, it gets
> the actual result type.
>
> It seems a bit of a "gotcha" to have it fail in this case when the
> result type isn't actually being checked in other cases.

To me, that sounds like a bug.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-01-11 20:08:58 Re: Packages: Again
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2017-01-11 20:07:06 Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project