Re: Statistical aggregate functions are not working with PARTIAL aggregation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Statistical aggregate functions are not working with PARTIAL aggregation
Date: 2019-05-08 12:22:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmoawHYK1ugyr_FTQiS52RWDH0Yjk-boDHJtJtYHMsSabPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:09 AM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> By the way, as mentioned above, this issue exists since 11 but
> harms at 12. Is this an open item, or older bug?

Sounds more like an open item to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-08 12:31:54 Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-05-08 10:10:35 Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid