| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
| Date: | 2016-02-16 12:47:28 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoawBByyrAqmHq-nyXgAz12LuKfuHzo6J6oDQh3A7XjuVw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> My opinion is that the submitted version is simple and fine for the purpose,
> and the plan you suggest replaces 5*2 repetitions by a lot of code and
> complexity, which is not desirable and should be avoided.
>
> However, for obvious reasons the committer opinion prevails:-)
You're welcome to solicit other opinions. I'm not unwilling to give
way if there's a chorus of support for the way you've done it. But to
me it sounds like you're saying that it doesn't really matter whether
the system is scalable and maintainable because we only have 5
functions right now, which is a design philosophy with which I just
don't agree.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-16 12:48:10 | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2016-02-16 12:42:18 | Re: WIP: Access method extendability |