Re: GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>
Cc: Darafei Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Date: 2017-10-12 16:14:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmoavxHHN2n4=mHwEMNZExZGZaOnOWxvKxa7J=R48mwCm2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com> wrote:
> DP> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>
> Seems like, we may also going to hit it and it would be cool this
> vacuum issue solved for next PG version.

Exactly which patch on this thread is someone proposing for commit?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-10-12 16:16:59 Re: advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-10-12 15:56:56 Re: Extended statistics is not working on Vars hidden under a RelabelType