Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maksim Milyutin <m(dot)milyutin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date: 2017-04-11 17:41:52
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoavi_Ng3PBpb8EK3VM3QpSZr=L-zDUcGVpmnsaGj39OCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> 2. DefineQueryRewrite() may try to scan a partitioned table in the case of
>> converting a table to view, where we must make sure that the table being
>> converted is empty. It's checked by scanning the heap, which we should
>> not do for a partitioned table. Nor should we try to drop the storage
>> once ready to make the table into a REKIND_VIEW relation (because all
>> other checks passed okaying the conversion).
>
> It looks like this patch intends to allow converting a partitioned table
> to a view. I would lobby for refusing the command, instead. There is
> no good reason to allow it, and it might well be a user error.

Yeah, I agree.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Borodin 2017-04-11 17:46:57 Re: Merge join for GiST
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-04-11 17:40:57 Re: logical rep worker for table sync can start and stop very frequently unexpectedly