Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date: 2022-07-06 12:25:04
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoavavffv2GTtZ-1=QUxZh020xfUUAOS6mXd9u_zFQ=9Qw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 7:56 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm looking into it, but it'd help to hear suggestions about where to put it.
> My current ideas aren't very good.

In main() there is a comment that begins "Most failures happen in
create_new_objects(), which has just completed at this point." I am
thinking you might want to insert a new function call just before that
comment, like remove_orphaned_files() or tidy_up_new_cluster().

Another option could be to do something at the beginning of
transfer_all_new_tablespaces().

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2022-07-06 12:30:57 Re: doc: Fix description of how the default user name is chosen
Previous Message Svetlana Derevyanko 2022-07-06 12:00:55 Re[2]: [PATCH] Optional OR REPLACE in CREATE OPERATOR statement