| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-06-20 20:14:49 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoavDqnVBJAHZCXM5-1KkR6876s94j8z92ip7O4mhdFOjQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:00 PM, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 10.x is the desired output.
10.x is the output that some people desire. A significant number of
people, including me, would prefer to stick with the current
three-part versioning scheme, possibly with some change to the
algorithm for bumping the first digit (e.g. every 5 years like
clockwork).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-20 20:20:20 | Re: 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-20 20:10:23 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |