From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only |
Date: | 2025-05-19 12:35:05 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaubuZ_pn1AWkHQVfMVnPwVZ9NhQY7c7i8j_wqevr_sDg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 7:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> While chasing down Valgrind leakage reports, I was disturbed
> to realize that some of them arise from a case where the
> executor scribbles on the plan tree it's given, which it is
> absolutely not supposed to do:
>
> /*
> * Initialize result tuple slot and assign its rowtype using the first
> * RETURNING list. We assume the rest will look the same.
> */
> mtstate->ps.plan->targetlist = (List *) linitial(returningLists);
>
> A bit of git archaeology fingers Andres' commit 4717fdb14, which we
> can't easily revert since he later got rid of ExecAssignResultType
> altogether. But I think we need to do something about it --- it's
> purest luck that this doesn't cause serious problems in some cases.
Is there some way that we can detect violations of this rule
automatically? I recall that we were recently discussing with Richard
Guo a proposed patch that would have had a similar problem, so it's
evidently not that hard for a committer to either fail to understand
what the rule is or fail to realize that they are violating it.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Isaac Morland | 2025-05-19 12:41:06 | Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only |
Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2025-05-19 10:25:00 | Re: Should we optimize the `ORDER BY random() LIMIT x` case? |