| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: some grammar refactoring |
| Date: | 2020-05-19 12:52:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoat8A2asWk3FygnvS9fdTPw7L-NybWG6toU80c3Mtb9ig@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 2:43 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is a series of patches to do some refactoring in the grammar around
> the commands COMMENT, DROP, SECURITY LABEL, and ALTER EXTENSION ...
> ADD/DROP. In the grammar, these commands (with some exceptions)
> basically just take a reference to an object and later look it up in C
> code. Some of that was already generalized individually for each
> command (drop_type_any_name, drop_type_name, etc.). This patch combines
> it into common lists for all these commands.
I haven't reviewed the code, but +1 for the idea.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2020-05-19 13:07:29 | Problem with pg_atomic_compare_exchange_u64 at 32-bit platformwd |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-05-19 12:50:42 | Re: Two fsync related performance issues? |