Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Date: 2017-08-25 19:13:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoasiihcYP60tsx-MB0O-KXCWZx6YPiD8qXDcWn04BPm3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:10 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 8/24/17 7:36 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> True as well. The patch looks good to me. If a committer does not show
>> up soon, it may be better to register that in the CF and wait. I am
>> not sure that adding an open item is suited, as docs have the same
>> problem on 9.6.
>
> Robert said he would commit this so I expect he'll do that if he doesn't
> have any objections to the changes.
>
> Robert, if you would prefer me to submit this to the CF I'm happy to do so.

Ha, this note arrived just as I was working on getting this committed.
I'll commit this to 11 and 10 presently; can you produce a version for
9.6?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2017-08-25 19:21:16 Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Previous Message David Steele 2017-08-25 19:10:48 Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior