From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior |
Date: | 2017-08-25 19:13:14 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoasiihcYP60tsx-MB0O-KXCWZx6YPiD8qXDcWn04BPm3A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:10 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 8/24/17 7:36 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> True as well. The patch looks good to me. If a committer does not show
>> up soon, it may be better to register that in the CF and wait. I am
>> not sure that adding an open item is suited, as docs have the same
>> problem on 9.6.
>
> Robert said he would commit this so I expect he'll do that if he doesn't
> have any objections to the changes.
>
> Robert, if you would prefer me to submit this to the CF I'm happy to do so.
Ha, this note arrived just as I was working on getting this committed.
I'll commit this to 11 and 10 presently; can you produce a version for
9.6?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2017-08-25 19:21:16 | Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2017-08-25 19:10:48 | Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior |