Re: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions
Date: 2020-01-21 21:55:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaquFgNS-YmEHK9P_dM3k4KCmbV1Edb0onYzi8B+V+k+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:40 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Given the lack of consensus about either of those being what we want,
> it doesn't seem like we're going to come to an agreement in a
> reasonable timeframe on a patch that includes either. So I'd like
> to get this done and move on to the next problem (ie, what is it
> we're actually going to do about the python 2/3 mess).

I'm fine with that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-01-21 21:55:30 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2020-01-21 21:38:20 Re: Add MAIN_RELATION_CLEANUP and SECONDARY_RELATION_CLEANUP options to VACUUM