Re: WIP: Secure Transport support as OpenSSL alternative on macOS

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Secure Transport support as OpenSSL alternative on macOS
Date: 2016-10-05 16:55:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaqDUNtq6NytYuNd_PN_n=_2HW8aiC39spwUz0cJ9+oMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> The main questions raised here are: is it of interest to support multiple SSL
> libraries given the additional support burden and; is supporting Secure
> Transport of any interest or is it a wasted effort to continue towards a full
> frontend/backend/doc submission?

I think this is highly worthwhile. I wish we could interest someone
in doing the work for Windows ... but I'm a macOS user myself, so I'll
be happy to have you fix my future compile problems for me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-10-05 16:59:41 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-10-05 16:52:51 Re: Hash Indexes