| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Translations contributions urgently needed |
| Date: | 2018-02-23 21:08:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoap4V0pMFbWOV7Mb5ue79NwH67oLgj1kP0fRUCXyX8hYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> That section is meant to say, if a translation ships in 10.0 with 81%
> but then drops to 79% because some backpatching changes strings, we
> won't drop it in 10.2.
>
> In the opposite case, it would be added to a minor release.
Good to know, thanks.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-23 21:25:16 | Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-02-23 19:09:42 | Re: Translations contributions urgently needed |