| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Clément Prévost <prevostclement(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered |
| Date: | 2016-08-02 20:53:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaobdYrJ1kSA4zCY_Cwk3AmTUd3Gj44Nb=aEGUGdeJ_Pw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/19/16 10:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Independent of that, it would help testing things like this if we allowed
>>> > setting max_worker_processes to 0, instead of the current minimum 1. If
>>> > there a reason for the minimum of 1?
>> I believe that's pure brain fade on my part. I think the minimum should be 0.
>
> Fixed.
Thank you.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-08-02 21:14:30 | Re: Why we lost Uber as a user |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-08-02 20:52:45 | Re: old_snapshot_threshold allows heap:toast disagreement |