Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes
Date: 2012-07-17 03:37:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaoVPO9LhJz5k4qFmgZ6TJfSxQroc_Vm_rMdGBHwBheiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> BTW, I wonder whether the code that checks for relfilenode conflict
> when selecting a pg_class or relfilenode OID tries both file naming
> conventions? If not, should we make it do so?

I don't believe it does, nor do I see what we would gain by making it to do so.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-07-17 03:49:42 Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-07-17 03:21:47 Re: b-tree index search algorithms