Re: elog(DEBUG2 in SpinLocked section.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pasim(at)vmware(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog(DEBUG2 in SpinLocked section.
Date: 2020-06-09 17:46:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoandgaD=+SznpsNEuyFPRTpAT0mGCrkMrbPr_rvL_fsFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:36 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Should we think about adding automated detection of this type of
> mistake? I don't like the attached as-is because of the #include
> footprint expansion, but maybe we can find a better way.

I think it would be an excellent idea.

Removing some of these spinlocks and replacing them with LWLocks might
also be worth considering.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-06-09 17:59:44 Re: elog(DEBUG2 in SpinLocked section.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-06-09 17:20:25 Re: Bump default wal_level to logical