| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: patch: move dumpUserConfig call in dumpRoles function of pg_dumpall.c |
| Date: | 2011-10-14 18:16:40 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoanAmR+6zbVL6r=Dz=_TGpSTWndiWTOc2fJ23GWn+O+QQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> writes:
>> Then there is a separate section of code that is called as a separate
>> function 'dumpUserConfig()' that does other role attributes like
>> 'ALTER ROLE bob SET role TO charlie'. These are the ALTER's that can
>> have dependencies on other roles.
>
> Right. Phrased that way, this is an obvious improvement, and I concur
> that it doesn't look like it could break anything that works now.
> The more general problem remains to be solved, but we might as well
> apply this.
OK, done.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-10-14 18:36:32 | Re: Large C files |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-10-14 18:00:30 | Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO |