From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables |
Date: | 2016-08-01 17:07:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoam8eRvicYGf_4BRMPy2Ri0e99MEcWweTQD6v_TW7XpGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Sure looks that way from here. Copy-and-paste from the previous
>>>> line in pg_proc.h, perhaps?
>>
>>> Yes, that's clearly wrong.
>
> Attached patch (pg_replication_origin_xact_reset_9.6.patch) fixes this.
> We need to apply this at least before RC1 of PostgreSQL9.6 will be released
> because the patch needs the change of catalog version.
>
>>> Damn. Can't fix that for 9.5 anymore. The
>>> function isn't all that important (especially not from SQL), but still,
>>> that's annoying. I'm inclined to just remove the args in 9.6. We could
>>> also add a note to the 9.5 docs, adding that the arguments are there by
>>> error?
>
> What about the attched patch (pg_replication_origin_xact_reset_9.5.patch)?
I think you should apply these ASAP.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2016-08-01 17:08:18 | Re: PostgreSQL 10 kick-off |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-08-01 16:38:21 | Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE |