| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Date: | 2015-09-26 00:22:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoam3400G2zjjvWKJOLSz=bqsfuCk3tGwxAVFvfnkDkKBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think initPlan will work with the existing patches as we are always
> executing it in master and then sending the result to workers. Refer
> below code in funnel patch:
Sure, *if* that's what we're doing, then it will work. But if an
initPlan actually attaches below a funnel, then it will break. Maybe
that can't happen; I'm just sayin' ...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-26 00:24:10 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-26 00:12:45 | Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members |