| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: background workers, round three |
| Date: | 2013-10-11 14:47:40 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoajaOCj8a6y7WEPQOE8=Ex1wJ=kZGXcwfKjOtOzeMc1LQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Finally I got the chance to put my hands on this code. Really sorry
> for the late replay.
Thanks for the review. I'll respond to this in more detail later, but
to make a long story short, I'm looking to apply
terminate-worker-v1.patch (possibly with modifications after going
over your review comments), but I'm not feeling too good any more
about ephemeral-precious-v1.patch, because my experience with those
facilities has so far proved unsatisfying. I think I'd like to
withdraw the latter patch pending further study.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-10-11 15:05:15 | Re: proposal: simple date constructor from numeric values |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2013-10-11 14:39:33 | Re: Cube extension point support // GSoC'13 |