Re: Deferring some AtStart* allocations?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deferring some AtStart* allocations?
Date: 2014-10-24 15:25:23
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoaj=7OHNUjPm19M5nsp1u89++D=kqioVkm4B_9PizMRSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> What I was thinking was that you'd append the messages to the layer one
> level deeper than the parent. Then we'd missed the invalidations when
> rolling back the intermediate xact. But since I was quite mistaken
> above, this isn't a problem :)

So, you happy with the patch now?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2014-10-24 15:27:28 Re: btree_gin and ranges
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-10-24 15:09:40 Re: uninitialized values in revised prepared xact code