Re: Today's failures on buildfarm member longfin

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Today's failures on buildfarm member longfin
Date: 2017-03-28 15:27:44
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoaj+Z7ed6dsAfUAnpgvQYs3jszC7KKktbtZMR8KREUL7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> As noted in the other thread, we could either fix this in a
> quick-and-dirty way by casting XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT and related
> values to "char" explicitly, or we could run around and change the
> target pointer variables to be "unsigned char *". The latter could
> prove to be pretty invasive if we try to carry it out fully, while
> if we don't, then we're arguably just moving the ugly casts someplace
> else.
>
> Opinions?

signed char sucks. Let's hit it with a stick.

:-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-28 15:29:42 Re: Monitoring roles patch
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-28 15:26:01 Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes.