| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |
| Date: | 2017-05-24 14:52:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaigU_uAw6uP+Jp8w9YumKiZjXETEGBE4KWOhgJ5RC+gA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Well, but then we should just remove minval/maxval if we can't rely on
> it.
That seems like a drastic overreaction to me.
> I wonder if that's not actually very little new code, and I think we
> might end up regretting having yet another inconsistent set of semantics
> in v10, which we'll then end up changing again in v11.
I'm not exercised enough about it to spend time on it or to demand
that Peter do so, but feel free to propose something.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-24 14:54:30 | Re: BUG #14666: Question on money type as the key of partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-05-24 14:32:40 | Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-24 15:12:12 | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-05-24 14:46:57 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |