| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps |
| Date: | 2012-02-08 18:02:16 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaiKeUdLrL=C1gs5JMHyoxVngN9S5X3t_Djz5CbdPtKCQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> What we have now just isn't cutting it for 99% of our users, and we need
> to address that if we are going to ever make any real headway here.
>
> Why can't vacuum handle things automatically like checkpoint smoothing?
> Why can't it detect when it is falling behind and speed up? Why can't
> it see as busy background writer and slow down? Unless we answer
> these questions, we are not solving the problem for 99% of our users.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-08 18:20:19 | Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-02-08 17:58:51 | Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time |