| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul |
| Date: | 2013-01-27 17:01:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoahurxTZWrz+yvHKfP3r1aKUYwZEL0AEFbDo2st_+3i1w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> So... what happens when recovery ends? Do the settings loaded from
>> recovery.conf get reverted, or what?
>
> With current patch the settings are kept if set in postgresql.conf and
> discarded if they are loaded as GUC after a server restart or reload.
I can't understand that answer. Is there a word missing or something?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-27 17:04:34 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-01-27 16:23:02 | Re: Cascading replication: should we detect/prevent cycles? |