Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected
Date: 2017-07-08 03:11:06
Message-ID: CA+TgmoahhTsuPBoUDwcqaYYJir6yGH5MwWqk3TYnnhnA9eD-ZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.

I don't intend to rush this in before the beta2 wrap, although some
other committer is welcome to do so if they feel confident in the fix.
I will update again by July 17th.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-07-08 03:22:33 Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2017-07-08 01:28:30 Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II