From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected |
Date: | 2017-07-08 03:11:06 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoahhTsuPBoUDwcqaYYJir6yGH5MwWqk3TYnnhnA9eD-ZA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
I don't intend to rush this in before the beta2 wrap, although some
other committer is welcome to do so if they feel confident in the fix.
I will update again by July 17th.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-08 03:22:33 | Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2017-07-08 01:28:30 | Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II |