Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Date: 2017-10-04 16:00:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmoafrQewWR1isO6AMTXxbGn8z5OrpAM9+FnMRnEv6S-GQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> + Enables or disables the query planner's use of partition-wise join
> + plans. When enabled, it spends time in creating paths for joins between
> + partitions and consumes memory to construct expression nodes to be used
> + for those joins, even if partition-wise join does not result in the
> + cheapest path. The time and memory increase exponentially with the
> + number of partitioned tables being joined and they increase linearly
> + with the number of partitions. The default is <literal>off</>.
>
> I think this is too scary and too much technical detail. I think you
> could just say something like: Enables or disables use of
> partition-wise join, which allows a join between partitioned tables to
> be performed by joining the matching partitions. Partition-wise join
> currently applies only when the join conditions include all the
> columns of the partition keys, which must be of the same data type and
> have exactly matching sets of child partitions. Because
> partition-wise join planning can use significantly increase CPU time
> and memory usage during planning, the default is <literal>off</>.

Not enough caffeine, obviously: should have been something like --
Because partition-wise join can significantly increase the CPU and
memory costs of planning...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2017-10-04 16:23:17 Additional logging for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-04 15:40:32 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple