Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>>>> plpgsql raise statement with context
>>> Impasse. Everyone wants this feature in some form, but no consensus on
>>> whether to do this client-side or server-side.
>
>> +1 for server-side. Does anyone other than you even think that the
>> client side is a reasonable way to go?
>
> Yes. This is presupposing on the server side what the client will want
> to display.

Fair enough. I'm still not convinced we're doing anything other than
complicating what ought to be a simple matter. It is just a fact that
logging tracing messages in PL/pgsql functions is a pain in the butt
right now in some situations because you get a huge number of CONTEXT
lines that you don't want. Can we agree on some solution to that
problem without over-engineering this to infinity?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company