Re: remove more archiving overhead

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remove more archiving overhead
Date: 2022-07-07 14:37:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaeTe4oUT39A4nt=8LD6UJ5u0vcmGc5+Aksn-4oKRb8-w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:03 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for updating the patch. It looks good to me.
> Barring any objection, I'm thinking to commit it.

I don't object, but I just started to wonder whether the need to
handle re-archiving of the same file cleanly is as well-documented as
it ought to be.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2022-07-07 14:46:23 Re: remove more archiving overhead
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2022-07-07 14:03:43 Re: remove more archiving overhead