Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label
Date: 2023-11-20 19:47:52
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoae7=XFBMfBEW7YOCASq7_sv4ohT9T8PyQnz70VVco42Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:41 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> I can't see why a backup would continue to be valid without a manifest
> -- that's not very standard for backup software. If you have the
> critical info in backup_label, you can't afford to lose that, so why
> should backup_manifest be any different?

I mean, you can run pg_basebackup --no-manifest.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2023-11-20 19:48:39 Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for BRIN indexes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-11-20 19:46:13 Re: Annoying build warnings from latest Apple toolchain