Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
Date: 2016-12-22 23:13:51
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoae3S-VCvzRkcxC41E5_ddOWWJ51-+a5sXZGODKzDfMaw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-12-22 08:32:56 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I plan to commit this later today. Hope I got the reviewers roughly right.
>
> And pushed. Thanks for the work on this everyone.

Cool. Also, +1 for the important/unimportant terminology. I like that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-22 23:23:26 Re: varlena beyond 1GB and matrix
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-22 23:08:21 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take