Re: PATCH: jsonpath string methods: lower, upper, initcap, l/r/btrim, replace, split_part

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: jsonpath string methods: lower, upper, initcap, l/r/btrim, replace, split_part
Date: 2025-05-22 14:05:45
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoae0B0ax=ScZyziW7xm6f3v3ciNNZiZW0gZBqZnm2AHUQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 2:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Having said that, what's wrong with inventing some improved function
> names and never removing the old ones?

I don't particularly like the clutter, but if the consensus is that
the clutter doesn't matter, fair enough.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Quan Zongliang 2025-05-22 14:08:10 Re: ALTER DOMAIN ADD NOT NULL NOT VALID
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2025-05-22 14:02:16 Re: Retiring some encodings?