| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com, thom(at)linux(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem) |
| Date: | 2012-02-14 13:19:26 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoae-GpFiu5WS+xhUjBKv4CihBiwJRk8EwqvQ4gxDDC-cQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> I could not find out where is the origin of grammer conflicts, although
> it does not conflict with any options within ALTER FUNCTION.
>
> Do you think the idea of ALTER ... NOT LEAKPROOF should be
> integrated within v9.2 timeline also?
Yes. Did you notice that I attached a patch to make that work? I'll
commit that today or tomorrow unless someone comes up with a better
solution.
>> I also think we ought to stick create_function_3 into one of the
>> parallel groups in the regression tests, if possible. Can you
>> investigate that?
>>
> Not yet. This test does not have dependency with other tests,
> so, I'm optimistic to run create_function_3 concurrently.
Me, too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-02-14 13:27:28 | Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-02-14 11:40:35 | Re: pg_stats_recovery view |