Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Date: 2017-12-22 01:31:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoadynHsF2OqVBTaPE7ZJvRYDzLeb3q8O3Px8F5-C65K1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Hmm, patch 0008 removes data lines from the .h but leaves the dependent
> OID define lines around:

Just a question here -- do we actually have consensus on doing the
stuff that these patches do? Because I'm not sure we do.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2017-12-22 01:35:34 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-12-22 01:29:46 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning