| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: replication commands and log_statements |
| Date: | 2014-08-08 12:51:13 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoadGAdOmnz5QXJbptNFE2zXwX7phFejv3Nbs9tb1WVozw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> At 2014-08-07 23:22:43 +0900, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>> That is, we log replication commands only when log_statement is set to
>> all. Neither new parameter is introduced nor log_statement is
>> redefined as a list.
>
> That sounds good to me.
It sounds fairly unprincipled to me. I liked the idea of making
log_statement a list, but if we aren't gonna do that, I think this
should be a separate parameter.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-08-08 12:54:31 | Re: A worst case for qsort |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-08-08 11:58:14 | Re: psql: show only failed queries |